Plain-English guide

What protections are at stake?

The debate is not just about notice periods. It is about whether Chicago renters get enforceable rights when a landlord tries to push them out, raise costs, or ignore the rules.

Note: RLTO means the current law, the Residential Landlord Tenant Ordinance. PRO means the proposed Protecting Renters Ordinance. The FAIR Ordinance is the competing counterproposal.

Start here

The short version

Current Chicago law is the baseline. PRO would add enforceable protections for renters, while the FAIR Ordinance would leave out or weaken several of those protections.

Email your alderperson Call your alderperson See the comparison

Just cause

Just cause means a landlord needs a valid reason to end or refuse renewal of a tenancy. Without it, renters can follow the lease and still lose their home because the landlord simply chooses not to renew.

  • PRO would add just-cause protections.
  • The FAIR Ordinance leaves this core protection out.

Eviction defenses

A right matters most when a renter can use it in court. PRO adds clearer defenses when landlords violate notice, cause, or relocation rules.

  • Clear defenses help stop unlawful eviction cases before families are displaced.
  • The FAIR Ordinance does not include the same strong defense language.

Relocation help

No-fault displacement can still be devastating. If a renter is forced to move because of an owner move-in, demolition, or major rehab, moving costs can create a crisis.

  • Relocation assistance helps renters land safely.
  • The FAIR Ordinance does not match PRO's renter-centered relocation framework.

Fees and enforcement

Chicago renters also need transparent costs and a way to identify repeat violators. A rulebook without practical enforcement leaves renters to carry the burden alone.

  • Deposit and fee rules should make move-in costs predictable.
  • Registry and enforcement tools help make rights real.

Fair Notice must have a remedy

Chicago's Fair Notice rules set advance-notice periods before a landlord declines to renew. The important question is what happens when the landlord gives notice late.

  • Today, a renter can remain for the part of the notice period the landlord failed to provide.
  • The talking points argue that the FAIR Ordinance takes away that practical remedy, even while keeping notice periods on paper.

Enforcement needs funding

Rules without staff, investigations, and a place to go for help are difficult to use. The Department of Buildings cannot take on new work without capacity.

  • PRO proposes registry-fee funding and a Bureau of Rental Housing Services.
  • The FAIR Ordinance creates responsibilities without a dedicated funding source, according to the talking points.

Right to counsel

Eviction court is a high-stakes legal process. A tenant's ability to have a lawyer can determine whether their rights are heard at all.

  • PRO would make Chicago's eviction-counsel program permanent.
  • The FAIR Ordinance does not create that permanent right to counsel.

Who is covered and who is accountable?

Renters need to know which rules apply to their home and who actually owns it, especially when a building is held by an LLC or managed by an agent.

  • The talking points raise concern that the FAIR Ordinance narrows existing protections for some smaller buildings.
  • PRO's registry would require ownership information that helps tenants and the City identify responsible parties.

Support responsible landlords too

Strong renter protections and useful support for responsible landlords can coexist. Clear rules, model leases, and a single place for questions help everyone understand their obligations.

  • PRO includes landlord-facing education and compliance support through rental housing services.
  • The talking points argue that the FAIR Ordinance does not provide comparable support.

Building housing without displacement

Chicago needs more homes. The advocates behind these talking points argue that housing growth should move forward alongside protections that keep current residents from being pushed out.

  • They say the FAIR Ordinance's supply measures do not replace renter protections.
  • They also point to protections used in other places as evidence that renter stability and housing production can advance together.

Source documents

Read the ordinances and public references.

The summaries above are based on the proposal texts and public talking points linked here. Contact information is drawn from the City Clerk directory checked July 8, 2026.

Protecting Renters Ordinance

Full proposal text.

Open PDF

FAIR Ordinance counterproposal

Full counterproposal text.

Open PDF

Primary local law

Current Chicago RLTO: Municipal Code of Chicago Chapter 5-12, Residential Landlords and Tenants.

View current Chapter 5-12